Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Bad bishop

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 10:59:01 10/18/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 18, 2003 at 13:43:15, Janos Keinrath wrote:

>On October 18, 2003 at 13:26:34, Dan Andersson wrote:
>
>> Here is a reminder not to take positional factors at face value. This is from a
>>team game today with me as white. I'm uncertain if this is a won position but it
>>is no doubt that the 'bad' white bishop is in the drivers seat. It would be
>>interesting to get the output from your favourite engines gentlemen.
>>[D]8/2b4p/k1p1p3/1pP1P1pP/4K1P1/PpB5/1P6/8 w - -
>>
>>MvH Dan Andersson
>>
>>PS The opening was an Alekine and a quick 30s-2m blundercheck yielded the
>>curious result that there were no obvious tactical errors in the game.
>>DS
>
>After white moves Bb4 the position is dead draw. Black can't break into the
>white camp.
>
>Janos

White is the side that tries to win.
White has a strong bishop because it can threats the pawn at g5 by Bd2.

I do not see what definition defines white's bishop as a bad bishop.

Uri

Uri




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.