Author: Russell Reagan
Date: 12:36:01 10/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2003 at 15:01:38, Uri Blass wrote: >There is no proof that Fritz book is better than Ruffian book for ruffian. > >Uri If you assume that, then it invalidates the result by Ruffian. If you don't assume that, then Ruffian had an extra advantage. Either way, it doesn't make sense to me why someone would run a tournament like that.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.