Author: Uri Blass
Date: 12:59:06 10/18/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 18, 2003 at 15:36:01, Russell Reagan wrote: >On October 18, 2003 at 15:01:38, Uri Blass wrote: > >>There is no proof that Fritz book is better than Ruffian book for ruffian. >> >>Uri > > >If you assume that, then it invalidates the result by Ruffian. If you don't >assume that, then Ruffian had an extra advantage. Either way, it doesn't make >sense to me why someone would run a tournament like that. People may be interested in using the same book for different engines because the target may be to find better engine for analysis and not the best engine+book. Uri Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.