Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 01:24:19 10/19/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 19, 2003 at 04:11:23, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On October 18, 2003 at 18:49:15, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>You are just angry Rebel lost, that's okay :) it's not okay to blame it on >>Jeroen. Blame Rebel for 13..Nf6? >> >>Ed > >You cannot blame Rebel for Nf6. Others would have played the same move. >(shredder7). ROTFL! Give me break :) Look, the King was out of book on move 2, better praise the King for playing 12.0-0! all by itself. Today is another today, yesterday is forgotten. Take care, Ed ======== >But WHAT you can blame is that from the moment the opponent chose >1.Nc3 almost ANYTHING in this game was forced. > >The engine had no chance. > >Nb5 brought it out of book. >then some forced moves came where the engine could not do any other thing. >then Bxb2, of course it takes this. and after O-O of course rebel takes >on a1. > >Step by step the engine is REACTING on a scenario that was began when 1.Nc3 >came. And WHY was this scenario clear ? because the line was in the book >until Nb5 came. >this line is in the commercial book. >it's a mistake to have this line in the leiden-tournament book. >because any program could have prepared a victory out of this line. > >this is the reason you use a DIFFERENT book when you play on a championship. >a smaller and completely different book. >this special small tournament book shall not contain OLD STUFF out of the >commercial book. > >no - the engine had IMO no chance in this game.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.