Author: Lawrence S. Tamarkin
Date: 09:53:53 11/09/98
Go up one level in this thread
Just for fun, Lets spend 40 million shekel's to determin whether Bruce Moreland should be inpeached! Then again, I don't see any Monica Lewinsky or Paula Jones, or Whitewater involved in all this, so forget it:) mrslug - the inkompetent chess software addict! On November 09, 1998 at 09:46:53, Peter Kasinski wrote: >On November 09, 1998 at 02:05:52, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>Wow, miss a week -- miss a lot. That's the way I feel after catching up on >>reading here after a short hiatus. >> >>It's my opinion that Bruce hasn't done anything deserving of condemnation here. >>It's very easy for me to keep straight what is written on >>rec.games.chess.computer and what is written here at the computer chess club, >>because I haven't read rec.games.chess.computer in so long that I would forget >>that it existed if not for the references to it found in CCC messages from time >>to time. >> >>As you might imagine, as a consequence of not reading r.g.c.c., I have very >>little idea of what anyone is writing there. So maybe I'm missing out on some >>nice flame wars... gee, shucks. Oh, but now I see I am starting to find similar >>content here. Fantastic, I'm so excited! >> >>Yes, and I have a bridge to sell you. >> >>If people want to object to statements made in r.g.c.c., why don't they do it in >>r.g.c.c.? What is the point of doing it here? Is there some attempt to convert >>the CCC to the cesspool that r.g.c.c. had become when I left it many months >>(over a year?) ago? >> >>As someone who reads only CCC posts, and doesn't recieve "insider email" from >>anyone who is or has ever been involved in an organizational capacity with the >>CCC, the recent public protests of resignation seem pretty groundless to me. If >>Bruce has said something in r.g.c.c. that raises the ire of others, please argue >>about it there. >> >>I am comfortable with the job that Amir, Bruce and Don have been doing, and all >>three moderators have my full support. > > >I agree. >Any group of moderators will be susceptible to demonstrations. >Which is perfectly fine by the way, provided we don’t conduct emergency >impeachment proceedings on that basis. > >Hoping for a kinder, gentler CCC. >Peter Kasinski > > > > > > > >> >>Dave Gomboc
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.