Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:56:38 10/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2003 at 07:55:29, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 20, 2003 at 07:50:21, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On October 20, 2003 at 07:14:59, martin fierz wrote: >> >>>this certainly doesn't look like -2.22 to me. white has the exchange, that's >>>true, but e.g. an exchange of queens probably wins for black thanks to the >>>monster pawn on b3. i'm not at all surprised that white does not win this... >>>he'd have to mate black, and with only two pieces left that's not so easy! >> >>I agree - your last remark is actually also exactly the bug I fixed in DS 1.7 >>the same night. > >bug? > >A bug is when the program behaves different than you expect. >If you did not implement some knolwedge it is not a bug because you cannot teach >it everything. > >> >>But every computer seems to evaluate this wrongly. > >In that case maybe correcting the wrong the evaluation to right evaluation can >cause correcting right evaluation to wrong evaluation in different positions. > >Uri The point is that there are position when the queen and rook are enough for mate attack and you may evaluate them wrong. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.