Author: Uri Blass
Date: 06:45:07 10/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2003 at 09:40:10, Brian Kostick wrote: >On October 19, 2003 at 17:07:23, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 19, 2003 at 17:01:44, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >> >>>On October 19, 2003 at 16:58:23, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>Hi Uri, >>> >>>Still no reaction on my posting of today!? >>> >>>Keep on dreaming about the selfproclaimed opening trap! >>>Johan convinced me it wasn't, so what's your point now? >>> >>>Jeroen >>> >>> >>>PS I am very curious what will be next, how can I be blamed >>>for the Diep-Rebel disaster :-)). >> >>I do not say that you are quilty but only that it was a mistake to allow a line >>that the commercial version could play. >> >>I do not claim that in this case Rebel lost because of that mistake and of >>course in case of no preperation the result is not your fault. >> >>Uri > > >A few days ago you stated the engine is at fault if it does not check the book >moves. Following that, to one conclusion, is that Jeroen can not be at fault. BK It was another case. In that case it was a stupid mistake. I do not say that blunder checking of the book moves by the engine can prevent every mistake but it can prevent at least mistakes that lead to scores like +9 for the opponent and the bad move of hiarcs was leading to something like that. It was not the case in the game when Rebel lost so it is not relevant. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.