Author: Ralph E. Carter
Date: 11:43:45 11/09/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 1998 at 12:15:08, odell hall wrote: > >On November 09, 1998 at 04:28:18, Graham Laight wrote: > >>Again - it is fine to criticise the play of Hiarcs, but if you accuse it of >>having a rating which is too high, it is incumbent on you to explain how its >>rating could have become so high in the first place. > > >I cannot explain the high rating of hiarcs6 other than to say that it's rating >is exclusively based on games against computers only. I wonder if it's rating >would be so high in games against humans? I doubt it very seriously if it cannot >beat a 1882 player consistently how is it going to handle international master >and grandmasters? When I first got hiarcs6 I was in love with the programming >praising it's human play, until I started seeing all the holes in it's game!! So, what are its holes, in your opinion?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.