Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 20:28:46 10/20/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 20, 2003 at 21:41:25, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>On October 20, 2003 at 19:21:52, Theo van der Storm wrote:
>
>That's great.
>
>So if i disagree with any move of DIEP in the future i simply do not make it at
>the board and it can search on for an alternative until i like one and play it
>over the board.
>
>For example i disagreed bigtime with Bxf4 against Rebel.
>
>Nice to know that your interpretation is the opposite of the ICGA at the world
>champs as it allows the operator more now to influence the game by simply
>disagreeing with a move.
>
>All i have to do now is make a small window choice: "did you execute the move on
>the board?"
>
>If the answer is: "no i didn't execute it".
>
>then printf("so i will spend more time and perhaps i'll play a better move!\n");
>
>Vincent
>
It has really nothing to do with disageement of a move. Futhermore Jeroen
offered a draw after a2, not Rebel. And you agreed, not Diep.
Ernst.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.