Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 03:50:47 10/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 2003 at 05:18:10, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 21, 2003 at 03:49:35, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On October 20, 2003 at 23:17:08, Dann Corbit wrote: >> >>>A request for analysis (as long as you can stand it -- preferably 1 Hr/pos): >>> >>>[D]r1b1kb1r/2qn1p1p/p1Np1P2/3P4/1p6/5Q2/PPP4P/2KR1BR1 b kq - 0 1 >> >>I think 18...Nd7 is also lost for black after 19.Nc6, Dann. >>In this case almost everything is in the commercial Fritz book. >>Just look at both black rooks and the poor black bishop. >> >>If you do not think so please give me a line. >>I could try to refute it later on at home (with some help of my programs). >> >>Michael > >19.Nc6 Bb7 20.Bh3 Ne5 21.Rge1 Rg8 > >21...Rg8 is not in the Fritz8's book. Yes, therefore I said almost. In this line also 21...h5 is missing. I thought 21...Rg8 is bad because of 22.Bf5 but maybe 22...Rg6!? is possible. The idea is to give back material in order to castle long. Michael > >I did not do serious analysis of it but I found it as a drawing line in >correspondence games that Dann posted. > >Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.