Author: Omid David Tabibi
Date: 05:45:19 10/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 2003 at 05:12:35, Daniel Clausen wrote: >On October 20, 2003 at 23:51:41, Russell Reagan wrote: > >>http://www.chess-archive.com/ccc.php?art_id=304166 >> >>"I called computer chess "the most thoroughly researched area within compuer >>science", which is true as CC was born even before computers were created >>(Turing's simulations...)." >> >>Do you agree? Is computer chess the most researched area in artificial >>intelligence? How about in all of computer science? > >Define "most researched". Is it "number of hours spent in thinking about it"? >Number of articles posted about it? Number of years since the subject came up? >Etc. I made that statement having the definition of 'years since the subject came up and remained in active research' in mind, since "CC was born even before computers were created"... and it is still a subject of active research. But also taking other definitions like 'hours spent studying' or 'papers published', CC fares pretty well, considering that it is a narrow subfield of computer games which in itself is a subfield of artificial intelligence... > >W/o a definition, the discussion doesn't make much sense. (that won't hinder >people to agree or disagree on the subject of course ;) With a clear definition >we can just count or at least try to guess. :) > >Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.