Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:29:27 10/21/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 21, 2003 at 17:31:05, Matthew White wrote: >2x2.4Ghz Xeon (HT Enabled, but only two threads for shredder) >After 42 minutes, Shredder failed high on Bd7. > >Shredder 7.04 UCI 393 MB: >D1+ 00:37 1.23 Bf8h6 Qf3f4 >D1 00:37 1.25 Bf8h6 Kc1b1 >D2 00:37 1.41 Bf8h6 Kc1b1 Bc8b7 >D3- 00:37 1.16 Bf8h6 Kc1b1 Qc7d7 Qf3e2 Bh6e3 >D3- 00:37 0.65 Bf8h6 Kc1b1 Qc7d7 Qf3e2 Nc5e6 >D3 00:37 0.54 Bf8h6 Kc1b1 Bc8b7 Rd1e1 Ke8d8 >D4- 00:37 0.29 Bf8h6 Kc1b1 Nc5e4 Qf3xe4 Qc7e7 f6xe7 >D4 00:37 0.16 Bf8h6 Kc1b1 Bc8b7 Rd1e1 Nc5e6 Nd4xe6 f7xe6 Re1xe6 Ke8d8 >D5+ 00:37 0.41 Bf8h6 Kc1b1 Nc5d7 Rd1e1 Nd7e5 Re1xe5 d6xe5 Rg1g8 Rh8xg8 Bf1b5 >a6xb5 >D5 00:37 0.56 Bf8h6 Kc1b1 Nc5d7 Rd1e1 Nd7e5 Nd4c6 a6a5 Nc6xe5 d6xe5 >D6 00:37 0.35 Bf8h6 Kc1b1 Nc5d7 Rd1e1 Nd7e5 Nd4c6 Bh6d2 Re1e4 >D6+ 00:37 0.36 Nc5d7 Qf3e4 Nd7e5 Qe4xe5 d6xe5 Bf1h3 Bc8xh3 >D6 00:37 0.42 Nc5d7 Nd4c6 Nd7e5 Rd1e1 Bc8b7 Bf1e2 Ne5xf3 >D7 00:37 0.54 Nc5d7 Rd1e1 Nd7e5 Kc1b1 Qc7c5 Qf3e4 Bf8h6 Bf1d3 Bc8b7 >D8+ 00:38 0.79 Nc5d7 Rd1e1 Nd7e5 Kc1b1 Qc7c5 Qf3e4 Bc8b7 Qe4xe5 d6xe5 Bf1b5 >a6xb5 >D8 00:38 0.79 Nc5d7 Nd4c6 Nd7e5 Qf3e4 Bc8b7 Qe4c4 Ne5xc4 Rd1e1 Ke8d7 >D9 00:39 0.67 Nc5d7 Rd1e1 Nd7e5 Qf3h5 Bc8d7 Kc1b1 Qc7c5 Nd4f3 b4b3 a2xb3 >D10 00:45 0.87 Nc5d7 Kc1b1 Bc8b7 Bf1e2 Nd7e5 Qf3b3 000 Qb3xb4 Bf8h6 c2c3 >Bb7xd5 >D11- 00:52 0.62 Nc5d7 Qf3h5 Nd7xf6 Rd1e1 Bf8e7 Qh5g5 Rh8g8 Qg5xg8 Ke8d7 >Qg8xf7 Qc7xc2 Kc1xc2 b4b3 a2xb3 >D11 00:55 0.57 Nc5d7 Qf3h5 b4b3 Rd1e1 Nd7e5 a2xb3 Qc7a5 c2c3 Bf8h6 Qh5xh6 >Qa5a1 Kc1d2 Qa1d1 Kd2xd1 >D12 01:07 0.63 Nc5d7 Qf3h5 b4b3 Rd1e1 Nd7e5 a2xb3 Bc8b7 Bf1g2 Qc7a5 c2c3 000 >Qh5f5 Kc8b8 b3b4 >D13 01:52 0.71 Nc5d7 Kc1b1 Nd7e5 Rd1e1 Bc8b7 Nd4c6 Bb7xc6 d5xc6 000 Bf1xa6 >Kc8b8 Qf3e4 b4b3 Ba6f1 >D14 03:32 0.62 Nc5d7 Rd1e1 Nd7e5 Nd4c6 Bc8b7 Bf1h3 Bb7xc6 d5xc6 Ke8d8 Qf3d5 >Qc7b6 Rg1g5 Kd8c7 Re1xe5 >D15 07:35 0.64 Nc5d7 Qf3h5 Qc7c5 Rg1g7 Nd7e5 Rd1e1 Ra8a7 Re1xe5 d6xe5 Qh5xe5 >Bf8e7 Nd4c6 Qc5f2 Bf1h3 b4b3 >D16 14:34 0.51 Nc5d7 Qf3h5 Bc8b7 Nd4e6 Qc7b6 Ne6g7 Bf8xg7 f6xg7 Rh8g8 Bf1d3 >000 Bd3xh7 b4b3 a2xb3 Qb6e3 Kc1b1 Nd7e5 Bh7xg8 >D16+ 41:34 0.52 Bc8d7 Qf3e3 Ke8d8 Bf1h3 Bd7xh3 Qe3xh3 Qc7d7 Nd4c6 Kd8c7 >Qh3h4 Ra8e8 Rg1g5 >D16 01:01:52 0.52 Bc8d7 Rg1g7 000 Rg7xf7 Rd8e8 Kc1b1 a6a5 Nd4c6 Bf8h6 Rf7xd7 >Qc7xd7 Bf1h3 >D17 01:17:10 0.49 Bc8d7 Rg1g7 000 Rg7xf7 Bf8h6 Kc1b1 Rd8f8 Rf7e7 Qc7d8 Rd1e1 >Bh6d2 Bf1xa6 Nc5xa6 Qf3e2 Na6c7 Qe2xd2 That is something of a surprise. Bd7 is supposed to be a loser. I wonder if a refutation was found farther down the pv. I will need to compare it to the others.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.