Author: Uri Blass
Date: 00:53:34 10/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2003 at 03:48:24, Art Patterson wrote:
>On October 22, 2003 at 03:45:55, Art Patterson wrote:
>
>> [d]1r1qr1k1/p1pn1ppp/1p1b4/1N2p3/2P5/3P1QP1/P1P2P1P/R1B2RK1 w - - 0 15
>>
>> Rebel 12 in this position played nxa7, and loss very quickly after ..e4, only
>>Shredder7,02 and Junior 8 reject nxa7, Does it require a very sophicated search
>>not to take the pawn? Why do most engines (including Fritz8!!) want to gobble
>>the pawn and fall into trouble?
>
>
>here's the entire game
>
>
>
>[Event "ICC 60 0"]
>[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
>[Date "2003.10.22"]
>[Round "?"]
>[White "Nubian-Knight"]
>[Black "epanek"]
>[Result "0-1"]
>[ECO "C26"]
>[WhiteElo "2348"]
>[BlackElo "2595"]
>[PlyCount "52"]
>[EventDate "2003.??.??"]
>[TimeControl "3600"]
>
>1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. g3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Bg2 Nxc3 6. bxc3 Bd6 7. Ne2 O-O 8.
>O-O Nd7 9. d3 Rb8 10. c4 b6 11. Nc3 Bb7 12. Bxb7 Rxb7 13. Qf3 Rb8 14. Nb5 Re8
>15. Nxa7 e4 16. dxe4 Ne5 17. Qe2 c6 18. f4 Qd7 19. Be3 Ng6 20. Rad1 Qc7 21.
>Rxd6 Qxd6 22. c5 Qc7 23. cxb6 Rxb6 24. Qf2 Ra6 25. a3 Rxa3 26. Bc5 Ra6 {
>White resigns} 0-1
White had alternatives like 19.fxe5
The game does not prove that 15.Nxa7 is a losing move.
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.