Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 05:29:51 10/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2003 at 06:10:25, Gerhard Sonnabend wrote: >Hi ! > >The third match has continued. >(I only post the short tables here) > >Could any chessprogram profit from longer/shorter levels ? > >At the moment i carry out an experiment to find out if there are chessengines >which profit from shorter or longer (time)levels more than other engines. >The 2 finished matches were played on a P4-1600 / 64MB HTs / 4-TBs / ponder=off >with the "Noomen" (A-H) (=160 games every match) under the ChessBase-Fritz7-GUI. > >The current matches is (results after 140 games on each level): >Chess Tiger 15.0(CB) "Normal" vs Beta-WIN-Rebel 12 (style=Test12a) > Total (+ 1/2 -) in % > 5min/game 96.0-44.0 (78-36-26) 68.57 > 10min/game 92.0-48.0 (72-40-28) 65.71 > 30min/game 79.5-60.5 (53-53-34) 56.78 >120min/game 76.5-63.5 (45-63-32) 54.64 >(Played on a Cel. 1.8GHz / 128MB HTs / ...the rest look above) > >All the details, the tables and the games can be found on: >www.pcschach.de > >Best G.S. thanks. This is a very interesting experiment. I hope this third match will be finished soon. One suggestion, if you have time and are in the mood: Test Fritz 5.32 against Aristarch 4.21. According to some Ratinglists Aristarch profits form longer time-controls whereas Fritz 5.32 looses. Additionally these two engines are about equal strength. so it might be possible to see Fritz winning the blitz-matches, while aristarch winning the tournament-match. If this happens the "diminishing score"-argunent could be refuted. so try it out, please. I know Fritz 5.32 is not a current engine, but _if_ Christophe Theron is true it should benefit from quicker hardware and longer times as much as other (well-balanced) engines. regards Joachim
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.