Author: Harald Faber
Date: 07:48:37 10/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2003 at 03:49:21, Johan de Koning wrote: >In my few e-mail exchanges with SSDF I failed to mention this, because the issue >was how to set-up TK under CB. Question no.1: Why not setup TheKing in Shredder classic? It has a MUCH better reputation concerning getting winboard/uci engines to work than CB GUI. >That didn't work, and for the last couple of >months nothing seems to have happened. Unfortunataly I'm not very proactive >when it comes to other people's business, and I have a feeling SSDF testers are >exactly like me :-) And I thought I were lazy... ;-) >So the big question is: who's business is it? The big answer is: The one who demands the test. If I were SSDF tester and you some new name to me but asking "why don't you test CM?" I give you the answer that CM does not play with auto232. So if you still want CM to see in SSDF, you have to - provide some *easy* ( = easy to understand and only few steps to take ) to understand instructions on how to get CM work in some other GUI. - prove that this setup does work without any problems concerning the SSDF time control, hash table usage and permanent brain. - make a reasonable suggestion which opening book to use without getting advantages/disadvantages. These are my ( if I were SSDF tester ) conditions when I would start testing CM. So the answer can only be: It is YOUR business. :-) >Another one: why doesn't any SSDF tester ever join whatever discussion? Maybe they are tired giving the same answer again and again and again... ? >Addmittedly this question is just an attempt to move the blame away from me. >But still it is an important question, about SSDF in general. > >... Johan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.