Author: Mike Byrne
Date: 15:07:07 10/22/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 22, 2003 at 03:53:34, Uri Blass wrote:
>On October 22, 2003 at 03:48:24, Art Patterson wrote:
>
>>On October 22, 2003 at 03:45:55, Art Patterson wrote:
>>
>>> [d]1r1qr1k1/p1pn1ppp/1p1b4/1N2p3/2P5/3P1QP1/P1P2P1P/R1B2RK1 w - - 0 15
>>>
>>> Rebel 12 in this position played nxa7, and loss very quickly after ..e4, only
>>>Shredder7,02 and Junior 8 reject nxa7, Does it require a very sophicated search
>>>not to take the pawn? Why do most engines (including Fritz8!!) want to gobble
>>>the pawn and fall into trouble?
>>
>>
>>here's the entire game
>>
>>
>>
>>[Event "ICC 60 0"]
>>[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
>>[Date "2003.10.22"]
>>[Round "?"]
>>[White "Nubian-Knight"]
>>[Black "epanek"]
>>[Result "0-1"]
>>[ECO "C26"]
>>[WhiteElo "2348"]
>>[BlackElo "2595"]
>>[PlyCount "52"]
>>[EventDate "2003.??.??"]
>>[TimeControl "3600"]
>>
>>1. e4 e5 2. Nc3 Nf6 3. g3 d5 4. exd5 Nxd5 5. Bg2 Nxc3 6. bxc3 Bd6 7. Ne2 O-O 8.
>>O-O Nd7 9. d3 Rb8 10. c4 b6 11. Nc3 Bb7 12. Bxb7 Rxb7 13. Qf3 Rb8 14. Nb5 Re8
>>15. Nxa7 e4 16. dxe4 Ne5 17. Qe2 c6 18. f4 Qd7 19. Be3 Ng6 20. Rad1 Qc7 21.
>>Rxd6 Qxd6 22. c5 Qc7 23. cxb6 Rxb6 24. Qf2 Ra6 25. a3 Rxa3 26. Bc5 Ra6 {
>>White resigns} 0-1
>
>White had alternatives like 19.fxe5
>
>The game does not prove that 15.Nxa7 is a losing move.
>
>Uri
But it's not the best move and that is his point.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.