Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep Blue and the

Author: jonathan Baxter

Date: 21:34:26 11/09/98

Go up one level in this thread


On November 09, 1998 at 23:14:16, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On November 09, 1998 at 19:50:27, jonathan Baxter wrote:
>
>>On November 09, 1998 at 17:11:48, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>>
>>>>I am not accusing anyone of lying, I was not aware that feng hu personally told
>>>>bob hyatt about the match results. Still the question has yet to be answered why
>>>>haven't the games been revealed? This is a very simple question, If such a match
>>>>between deepblue and the micro's did in fact occur it is a tremendously
>>>>important event and should be published!
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>Hsu told me about this privately.  He and Murray both have discussed this at
>>>a couple of presentations they have given since the DB match.  however I doubt
>>>they will say much here as it would only take a word by one of them to get the
>>>personal attacks going like crazy, by those that "hate big iron."
>>>
>>
>>I don't hate "big iron" and I am not interested in attacking these guys
>>personally. But I do find it terribly disappointing and very surprising that
>>DB---the most exciting thing ever in computer chess and possibly AI as
>>well---only played one, inconclusive match against the human world champion and
>>then quit forever.
>>
>>It would have cost IBM almost nothing to put DB on ICC and have it play top
>>GM's, and the results would have been incredibly interesting for both human and
>>computer chess.
>>
>>Given the extent to which DB built upon freely published research, and the
>>amount of publicity IBM gained from the last Kasparov match, it seems to me that
>>letting DB play in open competition is the least IBM could have done to repay
>>their debt to the research community.
>>
>>Jon
>
>
>You think way too small, as do most of us.  When you look at the value of
>another Deep Blue vs someone match in a year or two, then you begin to
>understand why it is kept under wraps.  Interest is high.  A Karpov match
>would draw another crowd, as would a match against maybe Anand...

Ahhhh............

So, do you have some inside information that they are planning to resurrect DB
in a year or 2? Maybe with 10x faster hardware?

That would be way cool.

Jon



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.