Author: Johan de Koning
Date: 00:33:57 10/24/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 24, 2003 at 00:46:17, Harald Faber wrote: >On October 23, 2003 at 06:35:17, Johan de Koning wrote: > >>On October 22, 2003 at 10:48:37, Harald Faber wrote: >> >>>On October 22, 2003 at 03:49:21, Johan de Koning wrote: >> >>>>So the big question is: who's business is it? >>> >>>The big answer is: The one who demands the test. >>>If I were SSDF tester and you some new name to me but asking "why don't you test >>>CM?" I give you the answer that CM does not play with auto232. >> >>1. I never requested testing, let alone demanded. > >Right, YOU did not, but MANY others frequently do. Fair enough. Though I do agree with MANY others. It was your "YOUR" (3 messages back) that put me in short-cut mode. Especially since SSDF would like to add TK323 or CM9000 to the list. >>2. You're not an SSDF tester. > >That is why I wrote "If I WERE ..." ;-)) If I WERE a wise man I would say you're a [BLEEP] [BLEEP] !! But I'm not. :-) >>3. The SSDF list is still not an Auto232 list. > >It is no due, right, but in fact it has become an auto232 list several years ago >with ONE exception with an older CM version. That was 1998, and they still haven't changed the name to SAF list. >4. The SSDF is still a list by VOLUNTEERS, so WHO has the right to tell them >what to do? That's a rather dangerous statement! But as long as we're talking computer chess you're right. The testers are doing a great job. The programmers are doing a great job. And no one is going to tell either of them what to do. ... Johan
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.