Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer?

Author: Omid David Tabibi

Date: 12:16:24 10/24/03

Go up one level in this thread

On October 24, 2003 at 13:57:58, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:

>On October 24, 2003 at 13:36:26, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>>Not for Deep Sjeng.
>>>
>>
>>Your statement is wrong in context of his last comment.  Thread-safe
>>libraries _are_ slower.  They _have_ to be.
>
>I don't do threads, remember :)

No threads?! How do you conduct parallel search then (if I may ask)?


>
>--
>GCP

• Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 12:45:31 10/24/03
  • Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? Dave Gomboc 16:04:51 10/25/03
  • Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? Robert Hyatt 17:35:24 10/24/03
    • Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? Omid David Tabibi 07:53:56 10/25/03
      • Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? Robert Hyatt 11:34:06 10/25/03
    • Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? Djordje Vidanovic 21:15:59 10/24/03
      • Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 00:47:52 10/27/03
        • Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? Robert Hyatt 06:31:21 10/27/03
          • Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? Gian-Carlo Pascutto 09:03:33 10/27/03
            • Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? Robert Hyatt 10:02:22 10/27/03
      • Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? Robert Hyatt 11:35:37 10/25/03
        • Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? (another thought) Robert Hyatt 11:39:24 10/25/03
          • Re: Deep is bad on a single processor computer? (another thought) Gian-Carlo Pascutto 00:46:47 10/27/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.