Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 01:20:36 10/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 25, 2003 at 18:54:38, Peter Berger wrote: >On October 25, 2003 at 16:26:43, Jeroen Noomen wrote: > >>I believe 20 Kb1! kills this line completely, but I am sure some persons (who do >>not know this line, but always tend to disagree :-)) will try to come up with a >>defence. > >I am not sure if chess discussions at CCC make sense - but did you follow the >last one that showed that the Tiger and Fritz books have _nothing_ to offer >against 16. .. b4 ?! , but only lines that will lead to a forced draw? > >In case the answer is no , it will at least save some time for users who engage >in these discussions in the future. We (at least I) do not engage in these dicussions to help them to improve their books. Of course he has cooked up something against 16...b4 that might be at least deadly for programs, but he won't tell you. 16...Rb8? is even worse however. I don't need to analyse that move from black point of view. I know it's bad because it is too slow. In my huge game database there is not a single human game with that move. Michael
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.