Author: James T. Walker
Date: 08:24:07 10/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2003 at 08:41:56, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On October 26, 2003 at 08:28:13, Uri Blass wrote: >>If the target is to have no influence then it is better to have a bye. >> >>Uri > >yes, this was my point too. >hm. > >maybe it is something far from logical that i don't understand :-) > >sometimes spock is not able to understand and only kirk knows. I agree. The GNU program with no chance to even draw a game is a scham. A bye would have been more honest.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.