Author: Uri Blass
Date: 13:36:33 10/26/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 2003 at 16:26:51, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >Will, > >I scrutinised the position with Ruffian Leiden for a long time. Not only the >one you chose but the previous critical position where Ruffian exchanges his >black square bishop on e5, wishing to get rid of the white knight. Then I had a >look at all the positions you listed. Ruffian seems to be blind-folded, simply >does not realise the dangers in time. If assigned more time it spots Ng7, but >not at G/90, rather at the classical tournament time controls. Seems an >evaluation issue... Per-Ola will have food for thought. > >Djordje Some questions: 1)what are the main differences between Ruffian1.0.5 and Ruffian2? Is it tactics or evaluation? 2)Did you compare Ruffian2 and Ruffian1.0.5 in test suites? 3)I remember that Per-Ola said that Ruffian does not have knowledge of pawn storms. Did he fix this problem? Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.