Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 05:42:41 11/10/98
Go up one level in this thread
On November 10, 1998 at 00:34:26, jonathan Baxter wrote: >On November 09, 1998 at 23:14:16, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On November 09, 1998 at 19:50:27, jonathan Baxter wrote: >> >>>On November 09, 1998 at 17:11:48, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>>I am not accusing anyone of lying, I was not aware that feng hu personally told >>>>>bob hyatt about the match results. Still the question has yet to be answered why >>>>>haven't the games been revealed? This is a very simple question, If such a match >>>>>between deepblue and the micro's did in fact occur it is a tremendously >>>>>important event and should be published! >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Hsu told me about this privately. He and Murray both have discussed this at >>>>a couple of presentations they have given since the DB match. however I doubt >>>>they will say much here as it would only take a word by one of them to get the >>>>personal attacks going like crazy, by those that "hate big iron." >>>> >>> >>>I don't hate "big iron" and I am not interested in attacking these guys >>>personally. But I do find it terribly disappointing and very surprising that >>>DB---the most exciting thing ever in computer chess and possibly AI as >>>well---only played one, inconclusive match against the human world champion and >>>then quit forever. >>> >>>It would have cost IBM almost nothing to put DB on ICC and have it play top >>>GM's, and the results would have been incredibly interesting for both human and >>>computer chess. >>> >>>Given the extent to which DB built upon freely published research, and the >>>amount of publicity IBM gained from the last Kasparov match, it seems to me that >>>letting DB play in open competition is the least IBM could have done to repay >>>their debt to the research community. >>> >>>Jon >> >> >>You think way too small, as do most of us. When you look at the value of >>another Deep Blue vs someone match in a year or two, then you begin to >>understand why it is kept under wraps. Interest is high. A Karpov match >>would draw another crowd, as would a match against maybe Anand... > >Ahhhh............ > >So, do you have some inside information that they are planning to resurrect DB >in a year or 2? Maybe with 10x faster hardware? > >That would be way cool. > >Jon No, not at all. Just an understanding of "corporate America" and the idea that if this can be done in a way that it is profitable for IBM, then it will be done. It won't happen until most "forget" about deep blue however, because the "glow" from that match is still visible... and I suspect that at corporate IBM, it is about company revenue at this point... Just an opinion, however...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.