Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 07:18:16 10/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2003 at 10:12:31, Jeroen Noomen wrote: Tiger didn't even see all the time the winning Kg7 Rh8 plans which i had in my PV all the time! it shuffled some and still won. also the h6 g5 i had in my mainline long before Tiger made 'em. instead of 0-0. Diep would not have castled but directly have put mate with h6! Note Fritz also plays h6 there in case some guess that only diep plays h6. It's just tiger not playing it. So let's not discuss there but mourn the loss of diep and understand why tiger doesn't show up at world champs. Congrats on your win nevertheless. The question i would like to raise though is why you didn't win this tournament with Sjeng instead of try to win with tiger + rebel. You played 1.d4 with Sjeng and very well prepared openings with Rebel+Tiger 1.e4 If you would have played 1.e4 with Sjeng it would have been tournament winner. No doubts there. >On October 27, 2003 at 07:29:38, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >Nonsense, Vincent! > >Tiger made the moves, not me. Besides, it was Diep allowing g7-g5 and playing >very badly. So if you call Tiger a bad amateur, what is your opinion of Diep!? >As far as I am concerned, Tiger played very well against Diep and Diep had no >chance. > >Jeroen > > > >>replace the word 'tiger' by Noomen. >> >>Without Noomen book, Tiger would be a bad amateur.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.