Author: Uri Blass
Date: 08:14:12 10/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2003 at 11:11:56, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 27, 2003 at 11:04:24, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On October 27, 2003 at 10:57:34, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>Again you fail your exam as statistical mathematician. >> >>Please apply statistics onto next. >> >>tested games: 100000 >> >>Best opening: 1.e4 >> >>opening played by Jeroen for Tiger + Rebel: 1.e4 >> >>Opening played by Sjeng : 1.d4 >> >>Sjeng is more aggressive and has less positional knowledge than the above 2 >>engines. >> >>What does your mathematical insight say to you here? > >I can only say that I do not know if e4 is better for Deep Sjeng. > >Novei beated it with black by 1.e4 c6 2.d4 d6 without a special killer book in >WBEC. > >Uri Only to make clear I do not mean to compare movei with Deep Sjeng(movei is certainly weaker) but to demonstrate that 1.e4 is not a sure win for Deep sjeng Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.