Author: George Tsavdaris
Date: 10:09:41 10/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2003 at 07:59:38, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >It is quite interesting to compare the performance of the 7 top placed programs >in Leiden in a little "fictional" round robin. Just look at the cross-table: > > >Dutch Open Leidan 2003 >======================= > 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >1 Ruffian * 1 ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 4,5 >2 The King 0 * 1 0 1 1 1 4,0 >3 Chess Tiger ½ 0 * ½ ½ ½ 1 3,0 >4 Deep Sjeng ½ 1 ½ * ½ ½ ½ 3,5 >5 Rebel 0 0 ½ ½ * 1 ½ 2,5 >6 IsiChess MMX 0 0 ½ ½ 0 * 1 2,0 >7 Diep ½ 0 0 ½ ½ 0 * 1,5 > > It would be interesting if in a top tournament like that,we had a different rating system. Like football for example. Win=3 points/Lose=0/Draw=1. Then The King would have won: Program Wins Draws Loses Points -------------------------------------- TheKing 8 1 2 25 Ruffian 7 3 1 24 C.T-X 6 4 1 22 Rebel 6 3 2 21 Isichess 6 2 3 20 Dsjeng 4 7 0 19 Diep 5 3 3 18 The Baron 5 0 6 15 Tao 4 3 4 15 Xinix 3 3 5 12 Ant 2 4 5 10 Nullmover 2 1 8 7 Zzzzz 1 2 8 5 Gnu 0 0 11 0 ------------------------------------- I can't decide which rating system (football or chess) is best and as we saw, it does matter what system we use.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.