Author: Djordje Vidanovic
Date: 11:27:30 10/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2003 at 13:09:41, George Tsavdaris wrote: >On October 27, 2003 at 07:59:38, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: > >>It is quite interesting to compare the performance of the 7 top placed programs >>in Leiden in a little "fictional" round robin. Just look at the cross-table: >> >> >>Dutch Open Leidan 2003 >>======================= >> 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 >>1 Ruffian * 1 ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 4,5 >>2 The King 0 * 1 0 1 1 1 4,0 >>3 Chess Tiger ½ 0 * ½ ½ ½ 1 3,0 >>4 Deep Sjeng ½ 1 ½ * ½ ½ ½ 3,5 >>5 Rebel 0 0 ½ ½ * 1 ½ 2,5 >>6 IsiChess MMX 0 0 ½ ½ 0 * 1 2,0 >>7 Diep ½ 0 0 ½ ½ 0 * 1,5 >> >> > >It would be interesting if in a top tournament like that,we had a different >rating system. Like football for example. Win=3 points/Lose=0/Draw=1. >Then The King would have won: > >Program Wins Draws Loses Points >-------------------------------------- >TheKing 8 1 2 25 >Ruffian 7 3 1 24 >C.T-X 6 4 1 22 >Rebel 6 3 2 21 >Isichess 6 2 3 20 >Dsjeng 4 7 0 19 >Diep 5 3 3 18 >The Baron 5 0 6 15 >Tao 4 3 4 15 >Xinix 3 3 5 12 >Ant 2 4 5 10 >Nullmover 2 1 8 7 >Zzzzz 1 2 8 5 >Gnu 0 0 11 0 >------------------------------------- >I can't decide which rating system (football or chess) is best and as we saw, >it does matter what system we use. Great deductive powers on your part. I am thrilled by the analogy you used. If only my students exhibited that kind of creativity... Djordje
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.