Author: Chessfun
Date: 14:21:31 10/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2003 at 12:37:12, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >Sarah, > >you have a keen eye. It really was not Deep Sjeng 1.5 (I never bothered to >install it as I had the 1.4 Beta 11 engine, virtually the same as the commercial >1.5). Thus I am a little surprised that the commercially released 1.5 did not >find the way to the win. Regardless, on the basis of the analyses by Ruffian >Leiden and Chess Tiger you could have made sure that Ant had a winning position >due to the harnassed rook and the mobile black king after the exchange on c4. > >Thanks for keeping your eyes open :-) > >Djordje Also a clarification. I have the e-mail listing all persons who received a copy of Deep Sjeng 1.4 beta 11 and your name isn't on the list?. And you state "you could have made sure that Ant had a winning position due to the harnassed rook and the mobile black king after the exchange on c4". My post simply pointed out that you were posting a wrong eveluation of DS and that Tiger 15 in this case also saw the winning line. In fact as you state earlier Shredder 7.04 can see no more here than DS. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.