Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 21:56:25 10/27/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2003 at 20:25:06, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 27, 2003 at 15:20:12, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >You are showing what you are yourself here very clearly. > >My question to Noomen was very clearly: > >"why do you play 1.e4 with years of preparation for Rebel + Tiger >and not with Sjeng" > >Somehow i miss the name 'diep' in the question. > >I'm not even asking after the games of diep versus Noomen books because i had >white in all games. > >That i prefer playing 1.d4 with DIEP myself, and so does Arturo (which is more >important than my opinion) is independant subject. > >So focus upon the subject please. You have been showing what you are yourself here very clearly for a long time now. My comment to you is very clearly: worry about the moves _your_ program plays, not the moves that someone else's program plays. Somehow I miss the name 'Vincent Diepeeven' in the preparation of Deep Sjeng. What Deep Sjeng plays is between GCP and JN. Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.