Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: FIND THE DIFFERENCE IN BOOK(I never blamed you in my post):

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 06:16:06 10/28/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 28, 2003 at 08:39:56, Arturo Ochoa wrote:

>On October 28, 2003 at 08:21:19, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On October 28, 2003 at 07:57:18, Arturo Ochoa wrote:
>>
>>>>
>>>>The point is repeating the same line that diep did not win.
>>>>It is not your fault.
>>>
>>>The point is another topic.
>>>
>>>The point is you cannot draw conclusions about me wihout knowing me.
>>>
>>>The point is you cannot conclude things if you dont have all the facts.
>>>
>>>The point is it is not nice to be insulted without having participated in this
>>>thread.
>>>
>>>The point is I dont like your jugdments.
>>>
>>>
>>>>I did not talk about you.
>>>>You cannot have a book that Diep always win with it but if Diep does not win a
>>>>game with your book it should not repeat the same line later when the opponent
>>>>can get at least a draw.
>>>
>>>Jeroen Noomen was also beated in this Tournament but he won more games. I dont
>>>complain about that.
>>>
>>>I cannot control if Diep plays the same line. I live in Venezuela but the
>>>Tournament was in Netherlands.
>>
>>Where did I blame you in my post?
>
>You said: "I am not fool.
>You are fool if you play the same opening in every game in an important
>tournament."
>
>The point is the Topic of the Thread was other.
>
>The point is you are not the appropiated person neither an authority to judge
>about decisions made in an Official Tournament. Calling such decisions as fool
>is calling me the same thing.

The decision not to give Diep learning from previous games was not your
decision(Diep could have some second line if first line does not win  when the
program learns from not winning to play the second line and it is Vincent's
fault not to care to have it).

>
>The point is you have not participated in Official Tournaments, you dont have
>Chess Tittles and you dont have all the facts to draw false conclusions.

Last time I did not respond about it because I was not sure if your meaning is
only about programming.

Some facts:

As a programmer I played only in tournament in the internet.

As a chess player
My Israeli rating is 1997

players begin today at 1350 and part of the Israeli titles are
1410 6th
1520 5th
1630 4th
1740 3th
1850 2th
1960 1th
2070 candidate master

>
>
>>
>>I did not say that it is your fault that Diep played the same line that it did
>>not win.
>
>Yo dont know that but you cannot judge without the complete evindence. Drawing
>conclusions based on circunstancial declarations is not intelligent.
>
>>
>>Blaming diep for repeating the same line that it did not win is not blaming you.
>>It is only against Vincent because he started in attacking other people like
>>Jeroen.
>>
>
>If the problem was between Vincent-Jeroen, why do you  feel involved? Calling
>fool such decisions means to call me fool. So, you dont want a personal troll
>here. Take care of your incorrect english.
>
>.

I was involved because Vincent blamed Jeroen for unsportivic behaviour when
Jeroen did nothing wrong based on Vincent's posts(it was not a case when I do
not know who is lying so it is better that I say nothing).

I think that other persons who read the discussion understood that I did not
attack you in this discussion.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.