Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 06:37:19 10/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2003 at 05:27:31, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: >On October 27, 2003 at 12:50:57, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 27, 2003 at 10:42:05, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On October 27, 2003 at 10:40:21, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>I asked question why noomen plays 1.d4 for Sjeng and 1.e4 with Rebel despite >>>already proof in round 1 that 1.e4 works better for such engines. >>> >>>You just posted here to make me ridicoulous. However you aren't you are making >>>an old idiot out of yourself by posting it like this. >> >>I didn't post anything to make you look ridiculous. You did that all by >>yourself. I simply pointed out that there is _no way_ to "guarantee_ a >>tournament will be won by a specific program. > >Of course there is a way... make the program in question the only participant. >José (: OK... then there is _one_ way... :) However, I find that the definition of "tournament" includes an implication that there is more than one "player". :) > >> You said there was. I >>simply disagreed. If that makes you look ridiculous, then perhaps you should >>look in the mirror to see why that is... >> >>My age seems to be a real sticking point with you. Age == Experience. >>You should learn that. Or by the time you get older, the above won't be >>true... >>
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.