Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: subject = Noomen book.

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 06:54:13 10/28/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 28, 2003 at 06:31:35, Mogens Larsen wrote:

>On October 28, 2003 at 00:01:26, Jeremiah Penery wrote:
>
>>So, maybe he screwed up.  Big deal.  The question remains why you are so worked
>>up about it.
>
>That isn't the interesting question. Maybe he wants to chuck a spanner in the
>wheels of Lokasoft or maybe it's just a reaction fueled by disappointment. Who
>cares? The important question is the decision of Noomen. As someone who dabbles
>with opening books on an amateur basis, it's a rather interesting discussion.
>Noomen discards knowledge of weakness against 1.e4 and chooses 1.d4 instead. Is
>he nervous that an amateur bookmaker is capable of finding a cure within a week?
>Hardly. An attempt to sabotage Deep Sjeng in favor of Rebel and Tiger? Probably
>not.
>
>But why not experiment? The tournament isn't that important and the championship
>is around the corner.
>
>Regards,
>Mogens

And perhaps he simply thinks Sjeng plays better with 1. d4 than with 1. e4.

I made the _same_ decision with Cray Blitz when we won the 1986 WCCC event.
Berliner could not believe we played 1. d4 against him in the critical last
round when we had _always_ played 1. e4 in the past with white.  We played
1. d4 pretty much from that point forward unless our opponent was known to
be significantly weaker than us...



This page took 0.02 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.