Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 09:05:27 10/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2003 at 21:02:53, Mike S. wrote: >On October 27, 2003 at 19:42:38, Drexel,Michael wrote: > >>On October 27, 2003 at 19:08:05, Drexel,Michael wrote: >> >>>On October 27, 2003 at 18:31:15, Mike S. wrote: >>>>(among other tournaments I guess) >>>>http://www.lsv-turm.de/ >>>>http://www.seminet.de/lsv/turniere/gm-turnier/gm-2003/live.htm#tabelle >>>>3/1 since many years. I think it's an interesting alternative, with a bonus >>>>for the "less drawish" player. > >>>I think it is crap. >>>Consider the following example: >>> >>>A,B play against C and D >>>A blunders a piece after 16 moves against C and resigns. >>>D blunders a piece after 18 moves against A and resigns. > >This is a *Grandmaster* tournament :-)) > >>There are of course counterexamples. > >Yes, for example that players like *Speelman, McShane, Chiburdanidze, >Romanishin, Naiditsch* & Co who played there in recent years, are somewhat >unlikely to attend tournaments with "crappy" counting systems. > Why not? These players don't get many round-robin tournament invitations. The counting system is probably not very important for them. Michael >>Good night >> >>Michael > >same :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.