Author: Richard Pijl
Date: 14:19:44 10/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2003 at 13:53:54, Gerd Isenberg wrote:
>On October 27, 2003 at 13:54:24, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>TPR view of the tournament (initial Elo average arbitrarily assigned to 2500):
>>
>>Program Elo + - Games Score Av.Op. Draws
>>Ruffian : 2768 204 222 11 77.3 % 2555 27.3 %
>>The King : 2732 204 311 11 77.3 % 2519 9.1 %
>>Deep Sjeng : 2707 219 86 11 68.2 % 2574 63.6 %
>>Chess Tiger : 2703 211 181 11 72.7 % 2533 36.4 %
>>Rebel : 2643 219 207 11 68.2 % 2511 27.3 %
>>IsiChess MMX : 2609 227 228 11 63.6 % 2512 18.2 %
>>Diep : 2597 237 192 11 59.1 % 2533 27.3 %
>>Tao : 2495 210 210 11 50.0 % 2495 27.3 %
>>The Baron : 2459 272 247 11 45.5 % 2490 0.0 %
>>XiniX : 2437 192 237 11 40.9 % 2501 27.3 %
>>Ant : 2388 172 227 11 36.4 % 2485 36.4 %
>>Nullmover : 2294 311 204 11 22.7 % 2506 9.1 %
>>Zzzzzz : 2242 277 197 11 18.2 % 2504 18.2 %
>>Gnu Chess : 1926 0 0 11 0.0 % 2526 0.0 %
>>
>>
>>Of course, this is the only logical way to score the tournament:
>>
>>Ranking after round 11 of Open Dutch Computer Chess Championship 2003
>>Name Score WP SB PS rat. TPR Corrected SB
>>-----------------------------------------------------
>>Ruffian 8.5 64.5 49.00 52.0 0000 - 0 41.50
>>The King 8.5 61.0 42.75 44.5 0000 - 0 38.75
>>Chess Tiger 8.0 63.0 39.25 45.5 0000 - 0
>>Deep Sjeng 7.5 67.5 44.00 44.0 0000 - 0
>>Rebel 7.5 59.5 31.50 42.0 0000 - 0
>>IsiChess 7.0 59.5 27.25 40.5 0000 - 0
>>Diep 6.5 63.5 28.25 39.5 0000 - 0
>>Tao 5.5 57.0 17.50 34.0 0000 - 0
>>The Baron 5.0 56.5 13.00 33.0 0000 - 0
>>XiniX 4.5 58.5 19.50 28.5 0000 - 0
>>Ant 4.0 56.5 12.25 27.0 0000 - 0
>>Nullmover 2.5 59.5 5.50 15.5 0000 - 0
>>Zzzzzz 2.0 59.5 3.25 16.0 0000 - 0
>>GNU Chess 0.0 61.0 0.00 0.0 0000 - 0
>>
>>But two other things jump out at me. The Baron's all or nothing approach
>>(actually, I like it). And Deep Sjeng's draw craze. I mean, Deep Sjeng's draw
>>list would make the most draw-happy super GM blush! {OK, wild exaggeration}
>>;-)
>>
>>Congratulations to all the participants. And may I say that while GnuChess was
>>mercilessly pounded into oblivion, it still is no pansy.
>>:-)
>
>Thanks Dann,
>
>curios about GNU-Chess Elo of 1926.
>I mean zero points tells nothing about the "quality" of the losses, e.g. the
>graph of skin resistance, pulse and blood pressure of opponent operator during
>the game.
It's simply 600 points below the average opposition.
Richard.
>
>Gerd
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.