Author: Joachim Rang
Date: 14:43:13 10/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 27, 2003 at 20:27:32, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 27, 2003 at 15:14:02, Joachim Rang wrote: > >You are showing what you are yourself here very clearly. > >My question to Noomen was very clearly sealed in a dry question: > >"why do you play 1.e4 with years of preparation for Rebel + Tiger >and not with Sjeng" > >Somehow i miss the name 'diep' in the question. > >I'm not even asking after the games of diep versus Noomen books because i had >white in all games. > >That i prefer playing 1.d4 with DIEP myself, and so does Arturo (which is more >important than my opinion) is independant subject. > >So focus upon the subject and stop the clowning. Jeroen answered that he believes, that Deep Sjeng plays very well with 1.d4. Is that so hard to understand? A child can not accept such a statement like you.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.