Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 15:23:23 10/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2003 at 04:59:44, Ed Schröder wrote: >On October 27, 2003 at 20:23:56, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On October 27, 2003 at 17:08:35, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>In Reply to: Re: FIND THE DIFFERENCE IN BOOK: posted by Jeremiah Penery on >>October 27, 2003 at 19:16:38: >> >> >>On October 27, 2003 at 19:16:38, Jeremiah Penery wrote: >> >>My question to Jeroen was very clearly : >> >>"why do you play 1.e4 with years of preparation for Rebel + Tiger >>and not with Sjeng which trivially is a 1.e4 engine even for outsiders >>like me" >> >>Somehow i miss the name 'diep' in the question. >> >>I'm not even asking after the games of diep versus Noomen books because i had >>white in all games. >> >>That i prefer playing 1.d4 with DIEP myself, and so does Arturo (which is more >>important than my opinion) is independant subject. >> >>So focus upon the subject and stop the poeting. > > >You are replying the wrong posting, reply to: > >http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?323980 > >Until now you haven't...... > >Be a man, either admit you are wrong, tack back your accusation and apologize to >Jeroen or start defending your case by answering Jeroen's rebuttal. > >Ed He keeps behind a 200 point stronger book to Sjeng or so, i'm not sure whether that's normal business but i know chessbase doesn't do it to brutus/fritz. Both have an equally strong book. What is good for brutus doesn't need to be good for fritz though. However what's good for Tiger, for sure is good for Sjeng. Both have the same attacking style. Very deliberately i didn't mention Rebel here. There is way more difference between Tiger and Rebel than there is between Tiger and Sjeng in terms of style. Yet Rebel and Tiger play with a different book than Sjeng. Sjeng book clearly chosing inferior lines which if i am in a hurry i would put in a book too, as you can prepare those lines quickly. Note that i am very impressed in the game Sjeng-Tiger that Sjeng kept it a draw by exchanging to a difficult endgame (misevaluated by Sjeng by the way) which again Sjeng managed to keep a draw thanks to superior search (and especially dual). What is the score internally of sjeng dual against tiger when both use the same books, so both 100% identical books? Answerring this question is very important. Best regards, Vincent
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.