Author: Gerd Isenberg
Date: 23:18:13 10/28/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2003 at 18:24:55, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On October 27, 2003 at 14:24:06, Jeroen Noomen wrote: > >Yes i know why you leave temporarily. > >I would want to know just one thing. > >Whose decision was it to give Rebel + Tiger, 2 engines with a different style, >near to the identical superior tournament book yours, and sjeng some weako >thing? > >Best regards, >Vincent > Vincent, you came up with this nonsense after Jeroen's schadenfreude about you (Vincent was relative quiete during the game...). Jeroen already explained Sjeng's 1.d4 - Sjeng won a lot of games with it against strong opponents. I see the potential problem, if one bookauthor is in charge for two or more programs during a tournament - specially if they play each other in a decisive situation. But to assume in public here that Jeroen weakens Deep Sjeng explicitly during the dutch open is a big affront against Jeroen from your side. To ask such canting questions as you do, has only the destructive purpose, to force distrust between Gian Carlo and Jeroen and probably to draw the attention to another subject than Diep's performance in Leiden. Why didn't Diep play 1.e4 against such weak amateurs as IsiChess? I guess you will hide some critical lines for Graz. The same may true for Deep Sjeng. Gerd
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.