Author: Uri Blass
Date: 01:41:14 10/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 29, 2003 at 02:18:13, Gerd Isenberg wrote: >On October 28, 2003 at 18:24:55, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>On October 27, 2003 at 14:24:06, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >> >>Yes i know why you leave temporarily. >> >>I would want to know just one thing. >> >>Whose decision was it to give Rebel + Tiger, 2 engines with a different style, >>near to the identical superior tournament book yours, and sjeng some weako >>thing? >> >>Best regards, >>Vincent >> > >Vincent, > >you came up with this nonsense after Jeroen's schadenfreude about you >(Vincent was relative quiete during the game...). Jeroen already explained >Sjeng's 1.d4 - Sjeng won a lot of games with it against strong opponents. I see >the potential problem, if one bookauthor is in charge for two or more programs >during a tournament - specially if they play each other in a decisive situation. >But to assume in public here that Jeroen weakens Deep Sjeng explicitly during >the dutch open is a big affront against Jeroen from your side. > >To ask such canting questions as you do, has only the destructive purpose, to >force distrust between Gian Carlo and Jeroen and probably to draw the attention >to another subject than Diep's performance in Leiden. > >Why didn't Diep play 1.e4 against such weak amateurs as IsiChess? >I guess you will hide some critical lines for Graz. >The same may true for Deep Sjeng. > >Gerd I do not think that Isichess is a weak amateur. Based on results it is the best amateur in the tournament. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.