Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:01:23 10/29/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 28, 2003 at 22:42:55, Russell Reagan wrote: >On October 28, 2003 at 20:44:56, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: > >>Below is a discussion of Dan Corbit about random books and random chosing >>alternatives from a random generated PGN book, something which was as far as i >>know, already refuted back in 1997 by Alexander Kure very clearly after which >>within a few years the rest followed in his footsteps (if they didn't already). > >Interesting. How did Alexander Kure refute that? Did he give some alternative >book making method? He didn't. He didn't even try. I _still_ use a book that is comprised of many games. It works perfectly well. It was good enough to beat Kure's book in one of the CCT events, and draw it in another. This is just rambling nonsense... don't give it much thought.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.