Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty Why?

Author: Matthew Hull

Date: 07:04:42 10/30/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 30, 2003 at 09:39:51, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>On October 30, 2003 at 04:56:17, Martin Andersen wrote:
>
>>On October 29, 2003 at 21:24:01, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>>
>>>Simple. Hyatts is no fully dedicated to Crafty, not being, as it is not, a
>>>commercial endeavour. Hyatt is a scientist and as such I guess he expends 95% of
>>>his time to research, teaching and the boring and long chores of academic jobs.
>>>To become as strong as Junior, Hyatt should dedicate as many time to crafty as
>>>Ban surely engages with his program.
>>>Just my educated guess.
>>>Fernando
>>
>>What Hyatt could do, in my dreams of course, is to
>>start a project for example at http://sourceforge.org where
>>Hyatt releases Crafty under the General public License.
>>This will encourage others to participate, so Hyatt don't have to
>>do all the development himself.
>>Furthermore, there could be several versions of crafty, one of them
>>focusing on playing strength and another on research.
>>
>>Martin.
>
>
>I have actually thought about doing this, and it might be a workable
>idea...


Doesn't GNU Chess use this model?  It does not seem to stay competitive,
although Zarkov is based on it and is fairly strong, I think.

MH



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.