Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Crafty Why?

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 07:40:33 10/30/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 30, 2003 at 10:04:42, Matthew Hull wrote:

>On October 30, 2003 at 09:39:51, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>On October 30, 2003 at 04:56:17, Martin Andersen wrote:
>>
>>>On October 29, 2003 at 21:24:01, Fernando Villegas wrote:
>>>
>>>>Simple. Hyatts is no fully dedicated to Crafty, not being, as it is not, a
>>>>commercial endeavour. Hyatt is a scientist and as such I guess he expends 95% of
>>>>his time to research, teaching and the boring and long chores of academic jobs.
>>>>To become as strong as Junior, Hyatt should dedicate as many time to crafty as
>>>>Ban surely engages with his program.
>>>>Just my educated guess.
>>>>Fernando
>>>
>>>What Hyatt could do, in my dreams of course, is to
>>>start a project for example at http://sourceforge.org where
>>>Hyatt releases Crafty under the General public License.
>>>This will encourage others to participate, so Hyatt don't have to
>>>do all the development himself.
>>>Furthermore, there could be several versions of crafty, one of them
>>>focusing on playing strength and another on research.
>>>
>>>Martin.
>>
>>
>>I have actually thought about doing this, and it might be a workable
>>idea...
>
>
>Doesn't GNU Chess use this model?  It does not seem to stay competitive,
>although Zarkov is based on it and is fairly strong, I think.
>
>MH

I don't know.  The question will turn into "how good are the people that
get involved?"  That is impossible to answer until after it happens.




This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.