Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 11:20:55 10/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 2003 at 12:29:22, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 30, 2003 at 10:12:20, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: > >>On October 30, 2003 at 10:01:50, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>I didn't "pretend" do know anything. I simply said that such "slips" don't >>>mean a thing. Tiger has been at the top of the SSDF. You haven't. Tiger >>>has won more than one CC event. You haven't. That is pretty strong evidence, >>>that is available in public, that suggests that such "leaked results" are not >>>very reliable. >> >>With all respect for Christophe, but Chess Genius also topped the SSDF >>list once. It doesn't mean a thing now, and the SSDF doesn't use duals either. > >Are we going to see Deep Sjeng in the ssdf? Working on it (it would help if the SSDF replied to my emails...) >The advantage from dual is less than the advantage from being twice >faster(probably less than 50 elo), so the fact that the ssdf does not use a >dual does not mean that people can learn nothing from the ssdf results. <mode=Uri> There is no proof that moving to a dual is less than 50 elo gain for Deep Sjeng, so you cannot conclude anything from a SSDF result in regards to the relative strength of Deep Sjeng vs ChessTiger on a single. </mode=Uri> -- GCP
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.