Author: Jeremiah Penery
Date: 19:28:54 10/30/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 30, 2003 at 08:14:24, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >I always wondered for a year or 10 why bob is doing such assumptions here. I see >it as a classical Hyatt-debating technique. > >"let your opponent proof everything from ground up". That's how a debate works, Vincent. If you make a claim, you have to prove it. Otherwise, you're blowing smoke out your ass and nobody has reason to believe you. If Bob makes a claim, the burden of proof rests on him, so he should be doing the proving. Most of the time, you are the one making weird claims, so Bob is correct to ask you to prove those claims. I've never once seen you actually prove something scientifically.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.