Author: Luis Smith
Date: 01:15:26 10/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
>I suspect the general consensus is that testing conditions should be a matter >between author and SSDF. Not the arbitrary opinion of chessmaster groupies. It >doesn't require a lot of common sense to conclude that the setup is faulty. Its not a matter of common sense, its a matter of opinion. As I >mentioned in our previous discussion, testing should be performed on the "out of >the box" object. Morgens: I suspect the general consensus is that testing conditions should be a matter between author and SSDF. Do you agree with this consensus? Besides why should the author get a say-so? SSDF owns the programs. And secondly, that testing should be conducted without >advantages or disadvantages (within reason), or not at all. Doesn't matter its SSDF's choice. Book and settings >obviously violate both. Without book isn't acceptable either. There's no valid >argument for your opinion. > >Regards, >Mogens
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.