Author: Daniel Clausen
Date: 06:44:42 10/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2003 at 09:36:08, Tord Romstad wrote: [snip] >Yes. This position is a good example of Bent Larsen's claim that "the major >weakness of computer chess programs is tactics" (I don't remember the precise >quote). While computer programs are good at finding shallow tactics quickly, >they still can't match the best human players at finding extremely deep >combinations. Is this the same Larsen who once played against DT, was in a position where he could capture an unguarded knight, didn't see a reason why not to, chose to capture it, DT answered with "mate in 17" or something and he didn't believe it but continued to play? ;) Sargon
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.