Author: Uri Blass
Date: 07:48:33 10/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2003 at 10:31:41, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On October 31, 2003 at 04:06:09, Luis Smith wrote: > >>Johan suggested that the SKR settings be used, so why shouldn't they? The >>author reccomends(sp?) them. Do a CCC search on "Johan De Koning" its under >one of those threads. He hasn't posted much. > >I'm not objecting to SKR. I'm objecting to the Fritz book and Fritz learner >being used. > >>I didn't know about Gromit. I don't understand why Alexander would have a say >>(he is a good book maker) because they own the program. Even if it was given >to them. Its SSDF's call not Alexanders. They aren't paid to test, its only >>for fun. They should be able to use any book they want. > >That's your idea - the rules for all serious competitions are different. >The SSDF at least _used_ to be a serious competition, I guess that time >is behind us now. It is a serious competition but I see no reason to decide to limit the players that are tested. I see no reason not to allow every combination of book and engines and learning. The only thing that chessbase can ask is not to write chessmaster9000 in their rating list but team A when there is going to be notes about the list that team A consist chessmaster9000,general.ctg book of chessbase and chessbase learning. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.