Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 09:21:12 10/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2003 at 04:06:09, Luis Smith wrote:
>On October 31, 2003 at 01:43:15, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>
>>On October 31, 2003 at 00:33:11, Luis Smith wrote:
>>
>>>Also note that Shredder 7.04 wasn't "out of the box"
>>>It was a download patch, with perhaps different settings or bug fixes. Is that
>>>an "unfair advantage". I would be suprised if Stephan reccomended(sp?) those >to Tony and SSDF.
>>
>>Uh, why wouldn't he? Moreover, it's a free update for Shredder 7 that was
>>done by Stefan himself.
>
>Johan suggested that the SKR settings be used, so why shouldn't they? The
>author reccomends(sp?) them. Do a CCC search on "Johan De Koning" its under one
>of those threads. He hasn't posted much.
Please stop bringing this up again and again.
Testing with the settings recommended by Johan is perfectly fine, as always been
allowed, and nobody is complaining against this as long as the normal customer
is able to use these settings without having to pay for additional stuff.
Testing free updates and settings recommended by the author is perfectly fine.
Mixing two products is not.
Christophe
>>>Crafty, Gromit, and other engines were allowed to use general.ctg, you weren't
>>>calling SSDF on that one either.
>>
>>You are wrong. There was a big complaint about Gromit, with a big complaint
>>from Alex Kure, and the SSDF agreed it should not be done again. And now
>>they're breaking that promise.
>
>I didn't know about Gromit. I don't understand why Alexander would have a say
>(he is a good book maker) because they own the program. Even if it was given to
>them. Its SSDF's call not Alexanders. They aren't paid to test, its only for
>fun. They should be able to use any book they want.
>
>
>>
>>>Besides rules and traditions change IMO this is a good thing. Most users of
>>>these engines usually don't use default settings, so it makes sense to test the
>>>popular ones.
>>
>>You are wrong. Most users do use the defaults. But I wouldn't mind the SSDF
>>testing an engine with tweaked settings. I do seriously object to an engine
>>being tested when it actually consists of _two_ commercial packages.
>
>Everyday or so a thread pops up in this forum asking where they can get the SKR
>settings for chessmaster. The only testers I know of that use the defaults are
>Sarah and Leo. Others such as Surak, Sedat, Kurt & Rolf use those settings, as
>well as many other people who run single tournaments (as well as myself)
>
>As far as two commercial packages is concerned, it is speculated (you even
>posted yourself) that UCI engines are seriously hampered when run under
>Chessbase GUI, something about hash IIRC. It won't be playing at full strength.
>
>Besides what does it matter what GUI it is tested under, as long as it gets
>tested? I don't understand how it is a conflict of interest, maybe I am naive
>but it might just up the sales of both programs, who knows?
>
>>
>>--
>>GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.