Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Usage of general.ctg book+CB learner by ChessMaster in SSDF testing

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 09:34:41 10/31/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 31, 2003 at 12:16:54, Christophe Theron wrote:

>On October 31, 2003 at 11:51:33, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On October 31, 2003 at 11:39:39, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote:
>>
>>>On October 31, 2003 at 11:36:18, Uri Blass wrote:
>>>
>>>>It does not make sense to use different hardware for different stage of the
>>>>games because nobody is using chess programs in that way.
>>>>
>>>>It make sense to use different software for different stages of the game.
>>>
>>>I remember switching machines once for endgame analysis, because one machine
>>>was marginally faster but didn't have EGTB.
>>>
>>>So there :)
>>>
>>>>You can think of Cyborg composed of parts also as a product that you can buy.
>>>>
>>>>People are interested in the question what is the best software that they can
>>>>buy.
>>>
>>>_That_ is correct. People aren't interested in 'whatever mix of packages that
>>>costs alltogether a lot of money can I put together so I have a huge mess that
>>>can play chess well' though.
>>>
>>>--
>>>GCP
>>
>>I do not think that it cost together a lot of money
>>prices became cheaper and good hardware costs more money so knowing that
>>chessmaster+kure book can top the ssdf may encourage people to buy both of them.
>>
>>Uri
>
>
>
>In this case the SSDF guys must be prepared to invest 10^43 years of work. After
>all, now they have to test every possible combination of opening book, engine
>for the middlegame and engine for the endgame.
>
>And what about engines that are supposed to be better in open positions?
>
>Mmh...
>
>
>
>    Christophe

I do not say that they have to test every combination and of course it is
impossible.

I only say that there is nothing to complain about if they test a combination
that is not a product of a single company espacially if a lot of people are
interested in it.

In the relevant case it is clear that people were interested in testing
chessmaster and I think that they were not interested in testing it without
learning or without book.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.