Author: Chessfun
Date: 10:11:44 10/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2003 at 11:20:18, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On October 31, 2003 at 10:58:01, Francesco Di Tolla wrote: > >>This is nonsense: if a program requires to be tested manually due to the lack of >>any interoperability protocol, then I prefer to see CM in ChessBase gui with a >>different book rather than no test at all. >>But since it appears that the CM book can be converted I see no need to discuss >>further. >>Just convert it and switch learning off. > >It can't be that difficult to comprehend the idea behind SSDF, ie. testing >commercial products as they appear to the customer. It isn't the strongest >possible configuration by popular opinion or preference. Both are irrelevant. In >some cases, however, testing can be difficult or impossible. Sometimes a >compromise is possible as long as it doesn't distort performance of the product >in question. How isn't crucial if the setup offers little or no distortion, >which is the gist of the paragraph you commented on. No nonsense in sight. > >If The King can be tested with a converted CM9K book and Nalimov EGTB, I suppose >the distortion would be minimal. Can CM9K books be converted or was it only true >for CM8K and older? CM9K books cannot be converted to other usable formats. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.