Author: Gian-Carlo Pascutto
Date: 13:34:30 10/31/03
Go up one level in this thread
On October 31, 2003 at 16:20:42, Joachim Rang wrote: >Of course there is the moral question. But SSDF was so many times accused of >not testing the TOP-Engines which are not from Chessbase and were so many times >accused to test in favor of Chessbase, that I think it is a good decision to >test the strongest Setting of The King with a decent book. If SSDF did not want to play manual games with The King, it was the responsibility of the company selling The King to help them getting it tested automatically. If they don't want to do this, there should be no reason to thank them for that by giving The King a totally unfair advantage. In case it still hasn't gotten through, a good book and a good learner represent a significant time and research investment and I'd be damn pleased if someone could tell me why The King gets it for free while programs like Rebel, ChessTiger and Ruffian have to make their own. -- GCP
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.